Improvements to marking a user as a Spammer

[johnjamesjacoby]

When marking a user account as a spammer, there are a few user metas that remain unchanged

• topic count
• reply count
• last post time

There may be others, but the result is that their topics & replies all get marked as spam, but their counts and activity see no change.

I'm sure there are a number of other metas that should be cleaned up when this happens.

[johnjamesjacoby]

In 7027:

Users: register the _bbp_last_posted meta key.

This commit ensures that the meta key used to check if a user needs to be slowed down is registered.

See #3305. For 2.6.4, branches/2.6.

[johnjamesjacoby]

In 7028:

Users: register the _bbp_last_posted meta key.

This commit ensures that the meta key used to check if a user needs to be slowed down is registered.

See #3305. For 2.7, trunk.

[johnjamesjacoby]

In 7029:

Users: ensure topic & reply counts and last posted time are updated when user is spammed & hammed.

This commit ensures that these user meta values are correct when a user is marked (or unmarked) as a spammer. In addition, the newer topic status function is used to ensure that Closed topics are included.

See #3305. For 2.7, trunk.

[johnjamesjacoby]

In 7030:

Users: ensure topic & reply counts and last posted time are updated when user is spammed & hammed.

This commit ensures that these user meta values are correct when a user is marked (or unmarked) as a spammer. In addition, the newer topic status function is used to ensure that Closed topics are included.

See #3305. For 2.6.4, branches/2.6.

[johnjamesjacoby]

Moving open issues from 2.6.4 to 2.6.5, for 2.6.4 release today.